11 November 2014 @ 10:00 am
Questions about Recs  
In honor of Rectober having wrapped up (SO MUCH FUN! all the kudos to [livejournal.com profile] birdsofshore for being awesome!), I thought I would ask ya'll a few questions about recs.

Obviously reccing is a big part of what I do on here, and I read a ton of fic with a variety of pairings and in multiple different fandoms. But I was wondering how other people went about recs. My "process" is probably a lot different from those of you who don't do a ton of fandom hopping, so I was curious!

1. What do you like in a rec? What are the things you absolutely need in a rec or in a rec list?

For me, I need a Title/link to the work, a summary, and a rating. If it doesn't have all of those things (especially if it's a huge list from somebody I don't know), I usually back button pretty quickly. But I also think the author's name and a word count should be there. And I really prefer if there is some kind of reason why the reccer liked it.

2. Spinning off of that, how important is the "Why" to you guys? Does what a reccer says about why they are reccing a fic influence you?

It definitely does for me, and I'd say most rec lists I've encountered leave this part off. I'm guessing it's just a matter of time constraints, but I do think those lists are less compelling.

3. Do you look for recs lists? Or do you just stick with recs from people you know/trust? Or do you rarely even read fics based on recs?

I often read fics based on recs. When I break into a new fandom I usually google rec lists and make my way through some of the prominent ones. I also frequently read recs from people I know. Especially this Rectober! I actually ended up reading a fic whose canon I'm not at all familiar with, which was a first for me.

4. I know a lot of rec "forms" have a place for excerpts from the fic. Do you find this useful? Do you look at these?

For me, I don't think I have ever once look at an excerpt included in a rec. I tend to make my decision on whether or not to read based on the header/reccer's thoughts, and it's just as easy for me to get a feel for the writing once I've started reading.

Finally, I had a personal question about reccing:

If I had a fic I liked, but I was hesitant to rec because of XYZ reason, do you think its better to leave a warning about said problematic issues, or just not rec it at all. This has happened a few times, and I've sort of waffled back and forth.

For example, I read an older H/D fic awhile ago that I thought was generally good, but there were (what I felt) were some significant issues regarding characterization and a few other details. In this particular fic, there ended up being a later scene that bothered me so much I had to stop reading, but before that I was enjoying the fic overall and would have recced it, but I don't know how comfortable I would have been doing that it without letting people know about some of the issues (it was a loooooong fic, and I think people should have an idea of potentially bothersome things, if they are planning to commit that much time.)

This fandom especially is super positive, but sometimes I feel like that hinders the ability to completely address problematic issues. I honestly appreciate reading candid notes when I look through rec lists, but I was curious what others thought.

LOL, I probably should have made a poll, but I already typed all this up, and not I'm too lazy to go and create a poll too...SORRY GUYS!
 
 
( Post a new comment )
writcraft[personal profile] writcraft on November 11th, 2014 11:46 pm (UTC)
I wasn't around in the days of Painless J's recs, but they were pretty much where I started in HP fandom in terms of choosing what to read. I read mainly on archives, coupled with the recs on those lists. So yes, I find rec lists enormously helpful. I think the recs Painless J wrote go to your final question about the hesitation in putting caveats on recs. It seems that's more recent perhaps, as opposed to having been the HP fandom norm. I don't mind caveats on recs at all, just looking at Painless J's list again I remember why I found those comments really helpful as a reader and I also appreciate that the reccer is clear to explain how their own personal tastes might have had an impact on what worked for them less well.

Ultimately, choosing whether or not to rec with a caveat is something for the person making the recs to decide, depending on what they are most comfortable with. As a creator, I would be thrilled to be recced on any basis, caveats or not :)

With respect to your recs, I think they're great! They give me the sort of info I'm looking for, in particular the why you mention which is absolutely very important to me. I love reading recs, even when they are not in fandoms I'm reading or writing in, and sometimes they push me towards something different which I really enjoy.

So thank you! :D

Edited 2014-11-11 11:50 pm (UTC)
gracerene[personal profile] gracerene on November 12th, 2014 03:15 am (UTC)
Yeah, I remember browsing through Painless-J's recs when I first got into fandom, and I defintiely appreciated their candor. And recs are obviously so subjective, which is part of why I want to disclaim, because I know some things that maybe only bothered me a smidge might be a bigger dislike for others. :D

Aww, thanks!! I basically started "reccing" just to keep track of my favorites, and I started trying to include all the things I had appreciated in other rec lists, so I'm glad they work for you. <3
i can see your house from here[personal profile] who_la_hoop on November 15th, 2014 09:32 pm (UTC)
I miss painless_j's recs. I was lucky enough to be recced by her a number of times, and while her blunt comments sometimes made me wince, I was always extremely pleased to be recced by her. She was extremely influential, and to be honest I think people took more notice of her recs *because* she wasn't 100% positive - I would always noticeably get more readers after a rec from her.

I think it probably helped though that she didn't seem to want to actively be friends with writers - so I don't think she worried if a rec would offend the writer in question. The rec wasn't *for* the writer; it was for fellow readers. (I know that I dither sometimes about including anything that's concrit-like in recs if the writer is, or could be, a friend!)